500 Wilcox Street

Joliet, IL 60435

www.stfrancis.edu

 

CORE II

 

CRN: 20187 - ACAF 01102 F- FRESHMAN CORE II

(Writing from sources on Self, Society, Faith and Commitment)

O:\Student Common\English\Chilton\Core 2

3 Semester Hours Spring Semester 2007
Prerequisite: Core I: 01101
Class Hours: MWF, 11:00-11:50 AM

II. INSTRUCTOR: Dr. Salim M. Diab
Office: Room 215, St. Albert Hall
Office Hours: TR 9:00-10:00 AM
Phone: 740-3855 (Ext. 3855)
Home Phone: 730-8302
e-mail: sdiab@stfrancis.edu
Homepage: http://www.stfrancis.edu/ns/diab/etherman.htm

III. COURSE DESCRIPTION:

This course is a continuation of the process you began last semester in Core I. We will continue to explore the methods of critical thinking and inquiry which underlie a liberal arts education. The assumption is that universal issues, reflected in all the arts and the science disciplines, may be illuminated by reading traditional and contemporary texts together. We will continue to explore the relationship of self to society and nature this semester, but we will examine this relationship as it relates to issues of faith and commitment in the modern world. Here are some of the issues we will explore this semester:

1. What obligations are placed upon us by our faith today?
2. What is the relationship between faith and the developed intellect?
3. On what basis do we make commitments - social, intellectual, and religious- in a modern world were values are ambiguous?

4. To what extent should we resist our society?
5. What basis do we have for answering these questions?

The course will focus on critical thinking and inquiry which form the basis of a liberal arts education. Here are some of the questions that we are interested in asking:

1. How do we make commitments in a modern scientific and technological world?
2. What obligations are placed upon us by our faith today?
3. To what extent should we live in harmony with our society?
4. To what extent should we resist our society in order to maintain the delicate balance between harmony and chaos?
5. What basis do we have and what philosophy have we adopted for answering these questions?

Course Objectives:

This course has two sets of objectives:
The first set has to do primarily with writing, especially writing from sources. By the end of this course, you should be better able to:
--identify and carry out research on a meaningful topic of genuine interest to you;
--narrate, paraphrase, summarize, compare, analyze, synthesize, argue, employ and cite accurately and correctly evidence from written and oral sources;
--draft, revise, and edit a long research paper --understand what constitutes plagiarism.

The second set of objectives has to do with the content of the readings in the course. By the end of the course, as we engage in the process of writing and research, you should be able to:
--develop an increased awareness of the way we articulate our relation to the natural world;
-- develop an increased awareness of the way we articulate our most deeply felt commitments (personal, intellectual, religious, and social); develop an awareness of the ways in which the language of our beliefs and commitments shapes our knowledge of ourselves and our environments.

IV. REQUIRED TEXTS AND ESSAYS:

Required Books:
Anouilh, Jean.  Antigone. Tran. Barbara Bray. London: Methuen, 2000.Originally performed in February, 1944, in Nazi occupied Paris.

Lunsford, Andrea. The Everyday Write: A Brief Reference. 2nd ed. New York: St. Martin’s, 2002.

Shaw, Bernard.  Saint Joan. New York: Penguin, 2001. St Joan had its world premier in December, 1923, in New York City.

Recommended Book:

Webster’s New World College Dictionary, 3rd ed. Ed. Victoria Neufeldt. New York: MacMillan, 1997.

 

Selections of Essays: For a copy of these essays, go to: O:\Student Common\English\Chilton\Core 2
1. Golding's "Thinking as a Hobby"
2. Hardin's "Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor"
3. King's "Letter from a Burmingham Jail"
4. Newman's "Enlargement of the Mind"

5. Milgram's "Obedience to Authority"
Selections of Stories:
1. LeGuin's "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas"

2. O'Brien's "On the Rainy River"
3. Wolff's "The Night in Question"
4. Updike's "A&P"

5. Stafford's "Trevelling Through the Dark"

6. Hudgins': Seventeen
Selections of Films:
1. Romero
2. Roses in December

V. COURSE OUTLINE:
Theme 1: Ambiguity and Commitment

W#1
Jan. 8 - Introduction to Course (assign King's Letter)
Jan. 10 - Common Experience: Lecture on "Investigative Research Paper" Dr. Chilton
                "What I know and what I need to know" – Auditorium

Jan.12 - Discuss Investigative Research Paper

 

W#2
Jan. 15 - Dr. King's Birthday - no class
Jan. 17 - King: "Letter from Birmingham Jail" Investigative Essay proposal Due "What I know and what I need to know"
Jan. 19 - King, assign Golding's  "Thinking as a Hobby"

 

W#3
Jan. 22 - Golding's  "Thinking as a Hobby" - Assign paper #1 on "Finding the Truth" and LeGuin’s)  
Jan. 24 - LeGuin: “The Ones Who Walk away from Omelas

Jan. 26 - LeGuin: “The Ones Who Walk away from Omelas, Assign Wolff:  "The Night in Question"

W#4
Jan. 29 – Paper #1 rough draft and workshop.
Jan.. 31 - Wolff:  "The Night in Question"

Feb. 2 -Wolff:  "The Night in Question"- Paper #1 due - Assign O’Brien: "On the Rainy River"            

Theme 2: Intellectual Commitment

W#5
Feb. 5   -  O’Brien: "On the Rainy River" Assign Milgram's "Obedience to Authority"

Feb. 7 -  Common Experience: Lecture on "Moral Choice and Vietnam" Dr. Bowers - Auditorium

Feb. 9   -  Milgram's

 

W#6
Feb. 12 - Milgram’s (assign paper#2 on "summary and critique")
Feb. 14 - Milgram: "Obedience to Authority"

Feb. 16 - Milgram - Assign Newman: "Enlargement of Mind"

 

W#7
Feb. 19 - Paper #2 rough draft and workshop

Feb. 21 - Newman
Feb. 23 - Newman - Paper #2 is due

 

W#8
Feb. 26  - Workshop on I- Search Investigative paper #4 - students sample papers

Feb. 28  - Workshop on I- Search Investigative paper #4 - format and content
Mar.  2  -  Mid-term self Assessment - (Assign Paper # 3 "Comparison and Contrast")

Mar. 3-11 Spring Break

Theme 3: Social Commitment

W#9
Mar. 12 - Common Experience: Lecture on "Latin America and Liberation Theology" - Auditorium

Mar. 14 - Romero (film): viewing – Auditorium 2 PM.

Mar. 16 - Discussion of Romero

 

W#10
Mar. 19 - View "Roses in December" film during class - Auditorium

Mar. 21 - Paper #3 rough draft and workshop, Assign Shaw's "St. Joan"

Mar. 23 - Shaw

 

Theme 4: Religious Commitment

W#11

Mar. 26 - Paper #3 is due, Shaw

Mar. 28 - Shaw

Mar. 30 – Common Experience: Lecture on "Women in the Time of Joan of Arc" - Auditorium

 

W#12
Apr. 2 - Shaw

Apr. 4 – Shaw - Assign Anouilh: "Antigone"

 

April 5-8  Easter Break

 

W#13
Apr. 9 - Anouilh
Apr. 11 - Anouilh
Apr. 13 - Anouilh

W#14
Apr. 16 - Anouilh
Apr. 18 - Anouilh

Apr. 20 - Anouilh

 

W#15
Apr. 23 - Students Presentations - Investigative (I Search) paper #4 is due
Apr. 25 - Students Presentations
Apr. 27 - Students Presentations - Portfolio is due

W#16
Apr. 30- May 3: Final Exam Week

 

VI. EXPECTATION OF STUDENTS:
1. Attendance is mandatory and class participation is crucial to the learning and teaching process in this course.
2. All assignments: four papers, portfolio, mid-term assessment, and final exam are due on time.
3. No make up assignments will be accepted unless there is a justifiable conflict.
4. Plagiarism will result in an F on the assignment and may result in an F for the course. (Read attachment on plagiarism)

Portfolios:
 What goes in the portfolio?
1. The student's name should not appear anywhere in or on the portfolio. Instead, each folder should be identified with the student's social security number.
2. Clean copies (no grades or instructor's comments) of the four main writing assignments.These must be in print or typed form.
3. A signed statement to the effect that all the work is the student's own, and none of the work is plagiarized.
4. A self-assessment of the student's writing abilities and experience of learning in core II, including an indication of which of the four main writing assignments represents the student's best writing and an explanation of its strengths, as well as an indication of which of the assignments was completed least successfully and an explanation of its weaknesses.
VII. Criteria for portfolio assessment:
1. Flexibility: ability to write in ways appropriate to different tasks or assignments and different audience expectations.
2. Originality: willingness to meaningfully challenge conventional wisdom and assert personal involvement in the learning process; may be interpreted as willingness to take risk.
3. Substance: presence of a general, controlling idea, thesis, or focus in conjunction with specific development through details, examples, or support; may be seen as the writer's ability to convey "something to say" as well as a sense of something experienced concretely.
4. Organization: coherence of thought at both discourse and paragraph levels; may be seen in appropriate cohesiveness, including ordering patterns (chronological, general-to-specific, etc.).
5. Style: focuses on sentence level and diction; refers to clarity, variety, complexity, and "voice," an individual touch or tone.
6. Standard usage and proper use of conventions: includes mechanics and citations.

VIII. Breakdown for Grading:

Grading:  Grades on various assignments will be weighted according to the following scale:

Paper #1.........................8%

Paper #2.........................8%

Paper #3.........................8%

Paper #4.........................16%

Subtotal..........................40%

Class Participation...........10%

Final Examinatio..............10%

Portfolio.........................40%

Total................................100%

 

IMPORTANT: All assignments must be e-mailed to me electronically through www.turnitin.com. You must log on and sign up for the course using the following ID and password – after which you will create your own password: Please note that the password is case-sensitive.

 

Class ID: 1762985

Password: dd2007

 

GRADING POLICY 

 

(fUniversity of St. Francis Undergraduate and Graduate Catalog)

Excellent (A):  The student performs in a consistently active, accurate, creative, and independent manner.  An ability is demonstrated not only to master the course material, but to synthesize and evaluate what was learned. 

Very Good (B):  The student is able to master the course content and often demonstrates creative thought and independence, but does not give evidence of a consistency in excellence. 

Satisfactory (C):  The student meets the basic expectations of the instructor, usually shows little initiative in attacking new problems, and indicates some progress in personal development. 

Passing (D):  The student demonstrates an inability to master fully the basic course requirements, but does give indication of minimal growth expectations.

Failure (F):  The student fails to meet the minimum course requirements. 

 

9. The Writing Center is an integral part of the student's education at USF. Visit the Center located on the second floor of the Library and find out how their eager staff are able to help you with your writing assignments.

 

PLAGIARISM

 

The following passage will serve as a working definition of plagiarism for this course:

All academic work, written or otherwise, submitted by a student to his or her instructor or other academic supervisor, is expected to be the result of that student's own thought, research, or self‑expression.  In any case in which a student feels unsure about a question of plagiarism involving his or her work, the student is obliged to consult the instructor on the matter before submitting it.

When a student submits work purporting to be his or her own, but which in any way borrows ideas, organization, [or] wording . . . from another source without appropriate acknowledgement of the fact, the student is guilty of plagiarism.

 

Plagiarism includes reproducing someone else's work, whether it be a published article, chapter of a book, a paper from a friend or some file, or whatever.  Plagiarism also includes the practice of employing or allowing another person to [write or significantly edit] the work which a student submits as his or her own, whoever that other person might be.  Students may discuss assignments among themselves or with an instructor or tutor, but when the actual work is done, it must be done by the student and the student alone.

 

When a student's assignment involves research in outside sources or information, he or she must carefully acknowledge exactly what, where, and how those sources have been employed.  If words of someone else are used, the student must put quotation marks around the passage in question and add an appropriate indication of its origin.  Making simple changes while leaving the organization, content, and phraseology intact is plagiaristic.  However, nothing in these rules shall apply to those ideas which are so generally and freely circulated as to be a part of the public domain.[1]

 

Submitting plagiarized work will result in an F on the assignment, and may result in an F for the course.

_______________________________________________________________________________

[1] Based on the Student Code of the University of Kentucky, as quoted by Michael Adelstein and Jean Pival in The Writing Commitment, 2nd ed. (New York:  Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1980), p. 194.

NOTE:  All students are responsible for being familiar with the "Guidelines on Academic Integrity" published in the University of St. Francis Undergraduate and Graduate Catalogue (pp. 37-38, 2002-2004 edition).  As of January, 2003, the College of Undergraduate Programs subscribes to turnitin.com, a service that checks papers for plagiarized content.

 

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity requires that all academic work be wholly the product of an identified individual or individuals.  Collaboration is only acceptable when it is Explicitly acknowledged.  Ethical conduct is the obligation of every member of the University community, and breaches of academic integrity constitute serious offenses.  Since a lack of integrity hinders the student’s academic development, it cannot be tolerated under any circumstances.  Violations include but are not limited to: cheating, fabrication, plagiarism, and denying others access to information or material.  See USF Catalog for further clarification and information on grievance procedures.

Special Needs

The University strives to be in compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations.  To this end, a student who requires special support or arrangements due to a disability should contact the Office of Disability Services Administrator, Pat Vivio at 815-740-3864 in Tower Hall S210 pvivio@atfrancis.edu to coordinate accommodations.  This contact should occur no later than the first week of classes in order to allow for sufficient time to provide accommodations.  Should a need arrive after the start of a semester, the student is encouraged to contact the ADA coordinator as soon as possible.  Each case will be reviewed on an individual basis.

Home
 
 

 

Catholic university rooted in the liberal arts, we are a welcoming community of learners challenged by Franciscan values and charism, engaged in a continuous pursuit of knowledge, faith, wisdom, and justice, and ever mindful of a tradition that emphasizes reverence for creation, compassion, and peacemaking. We strive for academic excellence in all programs, preparing women and men to contribute to the world through service and leadership.



     [1] Based on the Student Code of the University of Kentucky, as quoted by Michael Adelstein and Jean Pival in The Writing Commitment, 2nd ed. (New York:  Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1980), p. 194.